DECLARATION ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
DIGNITATIS HUMANAE
ON THE RIGHT OF THE PERSON AND OF COMMUNITIES
TO SOCIAL AND CIVIL FREEDOM IN MATTERS RELIGIOUS
PROMULGATED BY HIS HOLINESS
POPE PAUL VI
ON DECEMBER 7, 1965
1. A sense of the dignity of the human
person has been impressing itself more and more deeply on the consciousness of
contemporary man,(1) and the demand is increasingly made that men should act on
their own judgment, enjoying and making use of a responsible freedom, not driven
by coercion but motivated by a sense of duty. The demand is likewise made that
constitutional limits should be set to the powers of government, in order that
there may be no encroachment on the rightful freedom of the person and of
associations. This demand for freedom in human society chiefly regards the quest
for the values proper to the human spirit. It regards, in the first place, the
free exercise of religion in society. This Vatican Council takes careful note of
these desires in the minds of men. It proposes to declare them to be greatly in
accord with truth and justice. To this end, it searches into the sacred
tradition and doctrine of the Church-the treasury out of which the Church
continually brings forth new things that are in harmony with the things that are
old.
First, the council professes its belief
that God Himself has made known to mankind the way in which men are to serve
Him, and thus be saved in Christ and come to blessedness. We believe that this
one true religion subsists in the Catholic and Apostolic Church, to which the
Lord Jesus committed the duty of spreading it abroad among all men. Thus He
spoke to the Apostles: "Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have enjoined upon you" (Matt.
28: 19-20). On their part, all men are bound to seek the truth, especially in
what concerns God and His Church, and to embrace the truth they come to know,
and to hold fast to it.
This Vatican Council likewise professes
its belief that it is upon the human conscience that these obligations fall and
exert their binding force. The truth cannot impose itself except by virtue of
its own truth, as it makes its entrance into the mind at once quietly and with
power.
Religious freedom, in turn, which men
demand as necessary to fulfill their duty to worship God, has to do with
immunity from coercion in civil society. Therefore it leaves untouched
traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the
true religion and toward the one Church of Christ.
Over and above all this, the council
intends to develop the doctrine of recent popes on the inviolable rights of the
human person and the constitutional order of society.
2. This Vatican Council declares that
the human person has a right to religious freedom. This freedom means that all
men are to be immune from coercion on the part of individuals or of social
groups and of any human power, in such wise that no one is to be forced to act
in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether
alone or in association with others, within due limits.
The council further declares that the
right to religious freedom has its foundation in the very dignity of the human
person as this dignity is known through the revealed word of God and by reason
itself.(2) This right of the human person to religious freedom is to be
recognized in the constitutional law whereby society is governed and thus it is
to become a civil right.
It is in accordance with their dignity
as persons-that is, beings endowed with reason and free will and therefore
privileged to bear personal responsibility-that all men should be at once
impelled by nature and also bound by a moral obligation to seek the truth,
especially religious truth. They are also bound to adhere to the truth, once it
is known, and to order their whole lives in accord with the demands of truth
However, men cannot discharge these obligations in a manner in keeping with
their own nature unless they enjoy immunity from external coercion as well as
psychological freedom. Therefore the right to religious freedom has its
foundation not in the subjective disposition of the person, but in his very
nature. In consequence, the right to this immunity continues to exist even in
those who do not live up to their obligation of seeking the truth and adhering
to it and the exercise of this right is not to be impeded, provided that just
public order be observed.
3. Further light is shed on the subject
if one considers that the highest norm of human life is the divine law-eternal,
objective and universal-whereby God orders, directs and governs the entire
universe and all the ways of the human community by a plan conceived in wisdom
and love. Man has been made by God to participate in this law, with the result
that, under the gentle disposition of divine Providence, he can come to perceive
ever more fully the truth that is unchanging. Wherefore every man has the duty,
and therefore the right, to seek the truth in matters religious in order that he
may with prudence form for himself right and true judgments of conscience, under
use of all suitable means.
Truth, however, is to be sought after
in a manner proper to the dignity of the human person and his social nature. The
inquiry is to be free, carried on with the aid of teaching or instruction,
communication and dialogue, in the course of which men explain to one another
the truth they have discovered, or think they have discovered, in order thus to
assist one another in the quest for truth.
Moreover, as the truth is discovered,
it is by a personal assent that men are to adhere to it.
On his part, man perceives and
acknowledges the imperatives of the divine law through the mediation of
conscience. In all his activity a man is bound to follow his conscience in order
that he may come to God, the end and purpose of life. It follows that he is not
to be forced to act in manner contrary to his conscience. Nor, on the other
hand, is he to be restrained from acting in accordance with his conscience,
especially in matters religious. The reason is that the exercise of religion, of
its very nature, consists before all else in those internal, voluntary and free
acts whereby man sets the course of his life directly toward God. No merely
human power can either command or prohibit acts of this kind.(3) The social
nature of man, however, itself requires that he should give external expression
to his internal acts of religion: that he should share with others in matters
religious; that he should profess his religion in community. Injury therefore is
done to the human person and to the very order established by God for human
life, if the free exercise of religion is denied in society, provided just
public order is observed.
There is a further consideration. The
religious acts whereby men, in private and in public and out of a sense of
personal conviction, direct their lives to God transcend by their very nature
the order of terrestrial and temporal affairs. Government therefore ought indeed
to take account of the religious life of the citizenry and show it favor, since
the function of government is to make provision for the common welfare. However,
it would clearly transgress the limits set to its power, were it to presume to
command or inhibit acts that are religious.
4. The freedom or immunity from
coercion in matters religious which is the endowment of persons as individuals
is also to be recognized as their right when they act in community. Religious
communities are a requirement of the social nature both of man and of religion
itself.
Provided the just demands of public
order are observed, religious communities rightfully claim freedom in order that
they may govern themselves according to their own norms, honor the Supreme Being
in public worship, assist their members in the practice of the religious life,
strengthen them by instruction, and promote institutions in which they may join
together for the purpose of ordering their own lives in accordance with their
religious principles.
Religious communities also have the
right not to be hindered, either by legal measures or by administrative action
on the part of government, in the selection, training, appointment, and
transferral of their own ministers, in communicating with religious authorities
and communities abroad, in erecting buildings for religious purposes, and in the
acquisition and use of suitable funds or properties.
Religious communities also have the
right not to be hindered in their public teaching and witness to their faith,
whether by the spoken or by the written word. However, in spreading religious
faith and in introducing religious practices everyone ought at all times to
refrain from any manner of action which might seem to carry a hint of coercion
or of a kind of persuasion that would be dishonorable or unworthy, especially
when dealing with poor or uneducated people. Such a manner of action would have
to be considered an abuse of one's right and a violation of the right of others.
In addition, it comes within the
meaning of religious freedom that religious communities should not be prohibited
from freely undertaking to show the special value of their doctrine in what
concerns the organization of society and the inspiration of the whole of human
activity. Finally, the social nature of man and the very nature of religion
afford the foundation of the right of men freely to hold meetings and to
establish educational, cultural, charitable and social organizations, under the
impulse of their own religious sense.
5. The family, since it is a society in
its own original right, has the right freely to live its own domestic religious
life under the guidance of parents. Parents, moreover, have the right to
determine, in accordance with their own religious beliefs, the kind of religious
education that their children are to receive. Government, in consequence, must
acknowledge the right of parents to make a genuinely free choice of schools and
of other means of education, and the use of this freedom of choice is not to be
made a reason for imposing unjust burdens on parents, whether directly or
indirectly. Besides, the right of parents are violated, if their children are
forced to attend lessons or instructions which are not in agreement with their
religious beliefs, or if a single system of education, from which all religious
formation is excluded, is imposed upon all.
6. Since the common welfare of society
consists in the entirety of those conditions of social life under which men
enjoy the possibility of achieving their own perfection in a certain fullness of
measure and also with some relative ease, it chiefly consists in the protection
of the rights, and in the performance of the duties, of the human person.(4)
Therefore the care of the right to religious freedom devolves upon the whole
citizenry, upon social groups, upon government, and upon the Church and other
religious communities, in virtue of the duty of all toward the common welfare,
and in the manner proper to each.
The protection and promotion of the
inviolable rights of man ranks among the essential duties of government.(5)
Therefore government is to assume the safeguard of the religious freedom of all
its citizens, in an effective manner, by just laws and by other appropriate
means.
Government is also to help create
conditions favorable to the fostering of religious life, in order that the
people may be truly enabled to exercise their religious rights and to fulfill
their religious duties, and also in order that society itself may profit by the
moral qualities of justice and peace which have their origin in men's
faithfulness to God and to His holy will. (6)
If, in view of peculiar circumstances
obtaining among peoples, special civil recognition is given to one religious
community in the constitutional order of society, it is at the same time
imperative that the right of all citizens and religious communities to religious
freedom should be recognized and made effective in practice.
Finally, government is to see to it
that equality of citizens before the law, which is itself an element of the
common good, is never violated, whether openly or covertly, for religious
reasons. Nor is there to be discrimination among citizens.
It follows that a wrong is done when
government imposes upon its people, by force or fear or other means, the
profession or repudiation of any religion, or when it hinders men from joining
or leaving a religious community. All the more is it a violation of the will of
God and of the sacred rights of the person and the family of nations when force
is brought to bear in any way in order to destroy or repress religion, either in
the whole of mankind or in a particular country or in a definite community.
7. The right to religious freedom is
exercised in human society: hence its exercise is subject to certain regulatory
norms. In the use of all freedoms the moral principle of personal and social
responsibility is to be observed. In the exercise of their rights, individual
men and social groups are bound by the moral law to have respect both for the
rights of others and for their own duties toward others and for the common
welfare of all. Men are to deal with their fellows in justice and civility.
Furthermore, society has the right to
defend itself against possible abuses committed on the pretext of freedom of
religion. It is the special duty of government to provide this protection.
However, government is not to act in an arbitrary fashion or in an unfair spirit
of partisanship. Its action is to be controlled by juridical norms which are in
conformity with the objective moral order. These norms arise out of the need for
the effective safeguard of the rights of all citizens and for the peaceful
settlement of conflicts of rights, also out of the need for an adequate care of
genuine public peace, which comes about when men live together in good order and
in true justice, and finally out of the need for a proper guardianship of public
morality.
These matters constitute the basic
component of the common welfare: they are what is meant by public order. For the
rest, the usages of society are to be the usages of freedom in their full range:
that is, the freedom of man is to be respected as far as possible and is not to
be curtailed except when and insofar as necessary.
8. Many pressures are brought to bear
upon the men of our day, to the point where the danger arises lest they lose the
possibility of acting on their own judgment. On the other hand, not a few can be
found who seem inclined to use the name of freedom as the pretext for refusing
to submit to authority and for making light of the duty of obedience. Wherefore
this Vatican Council urges everyone, especially those who are charged with the
task of educating others, to do their utmost to form men who, on the one hand,
will respect the moral order and be obedient to lawful authority, and on the
other hand, will be lovers of true freedom-men, in other words, who will come to
decisions on their own judgment and in the light of truth, govern their
activities with a sense of responsibility, and strive after what is true and
right, willing always to join with others in cooperative effort.
Religious freedom therefore ought to
have this further purpose and aim, namely, that men may come to act with greater
responsibility in fulfilling their duties in community life.
9. The declaration of this Vatican
Council on the right of man to religious freedom has its foundation in the
dignity of the person, whose exigencies have come to be are fully known to human
reason through centuries of experience. What is more, this doctrine of freedom
has roots in divine revelation, and for this reason Christians are bound to
respect it all the more conscientiously. Revelation does not indeed affirm in so
many words the right of man to immunity from external coercion in matters
religious. It does, however, disclose the dignity of the human person in its
full dimensions. It gives evidence of the respect which Christ showed toward the
freedom with which man is to fulfill his duty of belief in the word of God and
it gives us lessons in the spirit which disciples of such a Master ought to
adopt and continually follow. Thus further light is cast upon the general
principles upon which the doctrine of this declaration on religious freedom is
based. In particular, religious freedom in society is entirely consonant with
the freedom of the act of Christian faith.
10. It is one of the major tenets of
Catholic doctrine that man's response to God in faith must be free: no one
therefore is to be forced to embrace the Christian faith against his own
will.(8) This doctrine is contained in the word of God and it was constantly
proclaimed by the Fathers of the Church.(7) The act of faith is of its very
nature a free act. Man, redeemed by Christ the Savior and through Christ Jesus
called to be God's adopted son,(9) cannot give his adherence to God revealing
Himself unless, under the drawing of the Father,(10) he offers to God the
reasonable and free submission of faith. It is therefore completely in accord
with the nature of faith that in matters religious every manner of coercion on
the part of men should be excluded. In consequence, the principle of religious
freedom makes no small contribution to the creation of an environment in which
men can without hindrance be invited to the Christian faith, embrace it of their
own free will, and profess it effectively in their whole manner of life.
11. God calls men to serve Him in
spirit and in truth, hence they are bound in conscience but they stand under no
compulsion. God has regard for the dignity of the human person whom He Himself
created and man is to be guided by his own judgment and he is to enjoy freedom.
This truth appears at its height in Christ Jesus, in whom God manifested Himself
and His ways with men. Christ is at once our Master and our Lord(11) and also
meek and humble of heart.(12) In attracting and inviting His disciples He used
patience.(13) He wrought miracles to illuminate His teaching and to establish
its truth, but His intention was to rouse faith in His hearers and to confirm
them in faith, not to exert coercion upon them.(14) He did indeed denounce the
unbelief of some who listened to Him, but He left vengeance to God in
expectation of the day of judgment.(15) When He sent His Apostles into the
world, He said to them: "He who believes and is baptized will be saved. He who
does not believe will be condemned" (Mark 16:16). But He Himself, noting that
the cockle had been sown amid the wheat, gave orders that both should be allowed
to grow until the harvest time, which will come at the end of the world.(16) He
refused to be a political messiah, ruling by force:(17) He preferred to call
Himself the Son of Man, who came "to serve and to give his life as a ransom for
the many" (Mark 10:45). He showed Himself the perfect servant of God,(18) who
"does not break the bruised reed nor extinguish the smoking flax" (Matt. 12:20).
He acknowledged the power of government
and its rights, when He commanded that tribute be given to Caesar: but He gave
clear warning that the higher rights of God are to be kept inviolate: "Render to
Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that are God's" (Matt.
22:21). In the end, when He completed on the cross the work of redemption
whereby He achieved salvation and true freedom for men, He brought His
revelation to completion. For He bore witness to the truth,(19) but He refused
to impose the truth by force on those who spoke against it. Not by force of
blows does His rule assert its claims.(20) It is established by witnessing to
the truth and by hearing the truth, and it extends its dominion by the love
whereby Christ, lifted up on the cross, draws all men to Himself.(21)
Taught by the word and example of
Christ, the Apostles followed the same way. From the very origins of the Church
the disciples of Christ strove to convert men to faith in Christ as the Lord;
not, however, by the use of coercion or of devices unworthy of the Gospel, but
by the power, above all, of the word of God.(22) Steadfastly they proclaimed to
all the plan of God our Savior, "who wills that all men should be saved and come
to the acknowledgment of the truth" (1 Tim. 2:4). At the same time, however,
they showed respect for those of weaker stuff, even though they were in error,
and thus they made it plain that "each one of us is to render to God an account
of himself" (Romans 14:12),(23) and for that reason is bound to obey his
conscience. Like Christ Himself, the Apostles were unceasingly bent upon bearing
witness to the truth of God, and they showed the fullest measure of boldness in
"speaking the word with confidence" (Acts 4:31) (24) before the people and their
rulers. With a firm faith they held that the Gospel is indeed the power of God
unto salvation for all who believe.(25) Therefore they rejected all "carnal
weapons:(26) they followed the example of the gentleness and respectfulness of
Christ and they preached the word of God in the full confidence that there was
resident in this word itself a divine power able to destroy all the forces
arrayed against God(27) and bring men to faith in Christ and to His service.(28)
As the Master, so too the Apostles recognized legitimate civil authority. "For
there is no power except from God," the Apostle teaches, and thereafter
commands: "Let everyone be subject to higher authorities.... He who resists
authority resists God's ordinance" (Romans 13:1-5).(29) At the same time,
however, they did not hesitate to speak out against governing powers which set
themselves in opposition to the holy will of God: "It is necessary to obey God
rather than men" (Acts 5:29).(30) This is the way along which the martyrs and
other faithful have walked through all ages and over all the earth.
12. In faithfulness therefore to the
truth of the Gospel, the Church is following the way of Christ and the apostles
when she recognizes and gives support to the principle of religious freedom as
befitting the dignity of man and as being in accord with divine revelation.
Throughout the ages the Church has kept safe and handed on the doctrine received
from the Master and from the apostles. In the life of the People of God, as it
has made its pilgrim way through the vicissitudes of human history, there has at
times appeared a way of acting that was hardly in accord with the spirit of the
Gospel or even opposed to it. Nevertheless, the doctrine of the Church that no
one is to be coerced into faith has always stood firm.
Thus the leaven of the Gospel has long
been about its quiet work in the minds of men, and to it is due in great measure
the fact that in the course of time men have come more widely to recognize their
dignity as persons, and the conviction has grown stronger that the person in
society is to be kept free from all manner of coercion in matters religious.
13. Among the things that concern the
good of the Church and indeed the welfare of society here on earth-things
therefore that are always and everywhere to be kept secure and defended against
all injury-this certainly is preeminent, namely, that the Church should enjoy
that full measure of freedom which her care for the salvation of men
requires.(31) This is a sacred freedom, because the only-begotten Son endowed
with it the Church which He purchased with His blood. Indeed it is so much the
property of the Church that to act against it is to act against the will of God.
The freedom of the Church is the fundamental principle in what concerns the
relations between the Church and governments and the whole civil order.
In human society and in the face of
government the Church claims freedom for herself in her character as a spiritual
authority, established by Christ the Lord, upon which there rests, by divine
mandate, the duty of going out into the whole world and preaching the Gospel to
every creature.(32) The Church also claims freedom for herself in her character
as a society of men who have the right to live in society in accordance with the
precepts of the Christian faith.(33)
In turn, where the principle of
religious freedom is not only proclaimed in words or simply incorporated in law
but also given sincere and practical application, there the Church succeeds in
achieving a stable situation of right as well as of fact and the independence
which is necessary for the fulfillment of her divine mission.
This independence is precisely what the
authorities of the Church claim in society.(34) At the same time, the Christian
faithful, in common with all other men, possess the civil right not to be
hindered in leading their lives in accordance with their consciences. Therefore,
a harmony exists between the freedom of the Church and the religious freedom
which is to be recognized as the right of all men and communities and sanctioned
by constitutional law.
14. In order to be faithful to the
divine command, "teach all nations" (Matt. 28:19-20), the Catholic Church must
work with all urgency and concern "that the word of God be spread abroad and
glorified" (2 Thess. 3:1). Hence the Church earnestly begs of its children that,
"first of all, supplications, prayers, petitions, acts of thanksgiving be made
for all men.... For this is good and agreeable in the sight of God our Savior,
who wills that all men be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth" (1 Tim.
2:1-4). In the formation of their consciences, the Christian faithful ought
carefully to attend to the sacred and certain doctrine of the Church.(35) For
the Church is, by the will of Christ, the teacher of the truth. It is her duty
to give utterance to, and authoritatively to teach, that truth which is Christ
Himself, and also to declare and confirm by her authority those principles of
the moral order which have their origins in human nature itself. Furthermore,
let Christians walk in wisdom in the face of those outside, "in the Holy Spirit,
in unaffected love, in the word of truth" (2 Cor. 6:6-7), and let them be about
their task of spreading the light of life with all confidence(36) and apostolic
courage, even to the shedding of their blood.
The disciple is bound by a grave
obligation toward Christ, his Master, ever more fully to understand the truth
received from Him, faithfully to proclaim it, and vigorously to defend it,
never-be it understood-having recourse to means that are incompatible with the
spirit of the Gospel. At the same time, the charity of Christ urges him to love
and have prudence and patience in his dealings with those who are in error or in
ignorance with regard to the faith.(37) All is to be taken into account-the
Christian duty to Christ, the life-giving word which must be proclaimed, the
rights of the human person, and the measure of grace granted by God through
Christ to men who are invited freely to accept and profess the faith.
15. The fact is that men of the present
day want to be able freely to profess their religion in private and in public.
Indeed, religious freedom has already been declared to be a civil right in most
constitutions, and it is solemnly recognized in international documents.(38) The
further fact is that forms of government still exist under which, even though
freedom of religious worship receives constitutional recognition, the powers of
government are engaged in the effort to deter citizens from the profession of
religion and to make life very difficult and dangerous for religious
communities.
This council greets with joy the first
of these two facts as among the signs of the times. With sorrow, however, it
denounces the other fact, as only to be deplored. The council exhorts Catholics,
and it directs a plea to all men, most carefully to consider how greatly
necessary religious freedom is, especially in the present condition of the human
family. All nations are coming into even closer unity. Men of different cultures
and religions are being brought together in closer relationships. There is a
growing consciousness of the personal responsibility that every man has. All
this is evident. Consequently, in order that relationships of peace and harmony
be established and maintained within the whole of mankind, it is necessary that
religious freedom be everywhere provided with an effective constitutional
guarantee and that respect be shown for the high duty and right of man freely to
lead his religious life in society.
May the God and Father of all grant
that the human family, through careful observance of the principle of religious
freedom in society, may be brought by the grace of Christ and the power of the
Holy Spirit to the sublime and unending and "glorious freedom of the sons of
God" (Rom. 8:21).
NOTES
1. Cf. John XXIII, encycl. "Pacem in
Terris," April 11, 1963: AAS 55 (1963) p. 279; ibid., p. 265; Pius XII, radio
message, Dec. 24, 1944: AAS 37 (1945), p. 14.
2. Cf. John XXIII, encycL "Pacem in
Terris," April 11, 1963: AAS 55 (1963), pp. 260-261; Pius XII, radio message,
Dec. 24, 1942: AAS 35 (1943), p. 19; Pius XI, encycl. "Mit Brennender Sorge,"
March 14, 1937: AAS 29 (1937), p. 160; Leo XIII, encycl. "Libertas
Praestantissimum," June 20, 1888: Acts of Leo XIII 8 (1888), p. 237-238.
3. Cf. John XXIII, encycl. "Pacem in
Terris," April 11, 1963: AAS 55 (1963), p. 270; Paul VI, radio message, Dec. 22,
1964: AAS 57 (1965), pp. 181-182.
4. Cf. John XXIII, encycl. "Mater et
Magistra," May 15, 1961: AAS 53 (1961), p. 417; idem, encycl. "Pacem in Terris,"
April 11, 1963: AAS 55 (1963), p. 273.
5. Cf. John XXIII, encycl. "Pacem in
Terris," April 11, 1963: AAS 55 (1963), pp. 273-274; Pius XII, radio message,
June 1 1941: AAS 33 (1941), p. 200.
6. Cf. Leo XIII, encycl. "Immortale
Dei," Nov. 1, 1885: AAS 18 (1885) p. 161.
7. Cf. Lactantius "Divinarum
Institutionum," Book V, 19: CSEL 19, pp. 463-464, 465: PL 6, 614 and 616 (ch.
20); St. Ambrose, "Epistola ad Valentianum Imp.," Letter 21: PL 16, 1005; St.
Augustine, "Contra Litteras Petiliani," Book II, ch. 83: CSEL 52 p. 112: PL 43,
315; cf. C. 23, q. 5, c. 33, (ed. Friedberg, col. 939); idem, Letter 23: PL 33,
98, idem, Letter 34: PL 33, 132; idem, Letter 35: PL 33, 135; St. Gregory the
Great, "Epistola ad Virgilium et Theodorum Episcopos Massiliae Galliarum,
Register of Letters I, 45: MGH Ep. 1, p. 72: PL 77, 510-511 (Book I, ep. 47);
idem, "Epistola ad Johannem Episcopum Constantinopolitanum," Register of
Letters, III, 52: MGH Letter 1, p. 210: PL 77, 649 (Book III, Letter 53); cf. D.
45, c. 1 (ed. Friedberg, col 160); Council of Toledo IV, c. 57: Mansi 10, 633;
cf. D. 45, c. 5 (ed. Friedberg, col. 161-162); Clement III: X., V, 6, 9: ed.
Friedberg, col. 774; Innocent III, "Epistola ad Arelatensem Archiepiscopum," X.,
III, 42, 3: Friedberg, col. 646.
8. Cf. CIC, c. 1351; Pius XII,
allocution to prelate auditors and other officials and administrators of the
tribune of the Holy Roman Rota, Oct. 6, 1946: AAS 38 (1946), p. 394; idem.
Encycl Mystici Corporis," June 29, 1943: AAS (1943) p. 243.
9. Cf. Eph. 1:5.
10. Cf. John 6:44.
11. Cf. John 13:13.
12. Cf. Matt. 11:29.
13. Cf Matt. 11:28-30; John 6:67-68.
14. Cf Matt. 9:28-29; Mark 9:23-24;
6:5-6; Paul VI, encycl. "Ecclesiam Suam," Aug. 6, 1964: AAS 56 (1964), pp.
642-643.
15. Cf. Matt. 11:20-24; Rom. 12:19-20;
2 Thess. 1:8.
16. Cf. Matt. 13:30 and 40-42.
17. Cf. Matt. 4:8-10; John 6:15.
18. Cf. Is. 42:1-4.
19. Cf. John 18:37.
20. Cf. Matt. 26:51-53; John 18:36.
21. Cf. John 12:32.
22. Cf. 1 Cor. 2:3-5; 1 Thess. 2:3-5.
23. Cf. Rom. 14:1-23; 1 Cor. 8:9-13;
10:23-33.
24. Cf. Eph. 6:19-20.
25. Cf. Rom. 1:16.
26. Cf. 2 Cor. 10:4; 1 Thess. 5:8-9.
27. Cf. Eph. 6:11-17.
28. Cf. 2 Cor. 10:3-5.
29. Cf. 1 Pet. 2:13-17.
30. Cf. Acts 4: 19-20.
31. Cf. Leo XIII, letter "Officio
Sanctissimo," Dec. 22 1887: AAS 20 (1887), p. 269; idem, letter "Ex Litteris,"
April 7 1887: AAS 19 (1886), p. 465.
32. Cf. Mark 16:15; Matt. 28:18-20,
Pius XII, encycl. "Summi Pontificatus," Oct. 20, 1939: AAS 31 (1939). pp.
445-446.
33. Cf. Pius XI, letter "Firmissiman
Constantiam," March 28, 1937: AAS 29 (1937), p. 196.
34. Cf. Pius XII, allocution, "Ci
Riesce," Dec. 6, 1953: AAS 45 (1953), p. 802.
35. Cf. Pius XII, radio message, March
23, 1952: AAS 44 (1952) pp. 270-278.
36. Cf. Acts 4:29.
37. Cf. John XXIII, encycl. "Pacem in
Terris," April 11, 1963:AAS 55 (1963), pp. 299-300.
38. Cf. John XXIII, encycl. "Pacem in
Terris," April 11, 1963:AAS 55 (1963) pp. 295-296.