Search this Site
Home
Contact
Feedback
Mail List
Anti-Catholicism
Catholic Apologetics
Catholic Calendar
Lent
Catholic Perspectives
Catholic Social Teaching
Christology
Church Around the
World
Church Contacts
Church Documents
Church History
Church Law
Church Teaching
Demonology
Doctors of the Church
Ecumenism
Eschatology
(Death, Heaven,
Purgatory, Hell)
Essays on Science
Evangelization
Fathers of the Church
Free Catholic Pamphlets
Heresies
and Falsehoods
Let There Be Light
Q & A on the Catholic Faith
Links
Liturgy
Mariology
Marriage & the Family
Modern Martyrs
Moral Theology
New Age
Occult
Political Issues
Prayer and Devotions
Pro-Life
Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults
Sacraments
Scripture
Spirituality
The
Golden Legend
Vatican
Vocation Links
& Articles
What the Cardinals believe...
World Religions
Pope John Paul II
In Memoriam
John Paul II
Beatification
Pope Benedict XVI
In Celebration

| |
Boston
Travesty
ROD DREHER
In
a broad sense the defrocked Geoghan is not on trial; Bernard Cardinal Law, the
Archbishop of Boston, who admits he knew about Geoghan's pedophile past as far
back as 1984 and reassigned him to parish work anyway, is. And so is the
American hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, whose tepid response to the
priestly pedophilia scandals has cost the Church untold tens of millions of
dollars in legal settlements, to say nothing of the ruined lives and shattered
faith of victims and their families.
"You can't believe how destructive this is. It's open season on the Catholic
Church here," says Phil Lawler, a Boston-area Catholic who edits Catholic World
Report. "The feminists and anyone who has a grievance against the Church are
coming out of the woodwork."
Lawler's not surprised, just depressed. This is what
occasions his despair: On January 14 in Boston, Father John Geoghan, the most
notorious accused pedophile priest in American history, went on trial for the
first of two criminal cases of alleged child rape and molestation. Over 90 civil
lawsuits against Geoghan and the Archdiocese of Boston stemming from Geoghan's
three decades of alleged rape and abuse of over 130 Boston-area children, have
yet to come to trial.
In a broader sense, though, the defrocked Geoghan is not on trial; Bernard
Cardinal Law, the Archbishop of Boston, who admits he knew about Geoghan's
pedophile past as far back as 1984 and reassigned him to parish work anyway, is.
And so is the American hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, whose tepid
response to the priestly pedophilia scandals has cost the Church untold tens of
millions of dollars in legal settlements, to say nothing of the ruined lives and
shattered faith of victims and their families.
It is about to get much worse for Law. The cardinal's lawyers failed to have
thousands of pages of internal Church documents related to the Geoghan case
sealed. By court order, on January 25, all these documents were to be released
to the public. Those familiar with the Geoghan affair expect the confidential
papers to address the questions, "What did the Church know, and when did it know
it?" — and the answers to be utterly damning to the Boston hierarchy.
Faced with the coming disclosure, and reeling from an extraordinary Boston
Globe series detailing the suffering of Geoghan's alleged victims and the
Church's role in continuing the priest's employment, Law gave a January 10 press
conference in which he said he was "profoundly sorry" for his "tragically
incorrect" decision to send Geoghan back into parish work, where he allegedly
continued to molest boys. Law announced a "zero tolerance" policy, which will
automatically remove child-molesting priests from the archdiocese, and which
directs archdiocesan employees who suspect another of sexual abuse to inform the
police.
"If all of a sudden this is the right thing to do, why didn't he do it before?"
fumes Stephen Brady, head of the lay group
Roman
Catholic Faithful. "It's obvious to me that the
only reason the bishops, and Law in particular, have reached this point is
because this is going to trial. We've heard from countless individuals about
this problem all over, and the story is always the same: [Bishops] only act when
you back them into a corner."
As Lawler points out, the Boston scandal is bringing out every left-wing
Catholic malcontent and dissenter, who will attempt to associate their causes —
women's ordination, abortion rights, and the like — with the case against the
Boston hierarchy. But Stephen Brady, a pizza-parlor owner from the small-town
Midwest, is not one of these cranks — and that could spell trouble for the
bishops.
According to its mission statement, Roman Catholic Faithful is "dedicated to
promoting orthodox Catholic teaching and fighting heterodoxy and corruption
within the Catholic hierarchy." The Petersburg, Ill.-based group, which has been
around since 1996, are best known for having revealed in 1999 the existence of
"St. Sebastian's Angels," a secret website for gay priests. The site, which is
no longer in existence, featured pornographic images and profane, sexually
explicit chat among homosexual priests.
One of the most avid posters was Reginald Cawcutt, the
Archbishop of Cape Town, South Africa, who, aside from detailing his sexual
fantasies, wrote that he looked forward to the deaths of Pope John Paul II and
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. Cawcutt suffered no sanctions for his participation
in St. Sebastian's Angels. He remains the head of the South African Bishop's
Conference.
It's this kind of inaction against corrupt bishops and priests by the Church
bureaucracy that drives faithful Catholics like Brady crazy. Commenting on the
Geoghan scandal, Brady commended the Boston Globe, not a paper known for
its support of traditional Catholics, for its reporting on the matter. He
believes the media reports, the civil lawsuits, and the criminal charges "aren't
indictments of the Catholic Church. They're indictments of the current
[Catholic] leadership in this country."
"Our belief is that let the hierarchy be sued for everything they have if that's
what it takes to protect the children," says Brady. "When there's no more
millions of dollars to do as you please with, then you'll find the true bishops
in poverty, standing on the street corner preaching the true faith. If it takes
the total collapse of our financial system for each diocese for these guys to
get their heads screwed on straight, so be it."
You would normally expect someone calling for the bankrupting of Catholic
dioceses to be upbraided by the vociferous
Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights,
the New York-based watchdog organization. Not this time. Bill Donohue, the
scrappy Catholic League chief who never backs away from a battle, is leaving the
Church to fight its own fight on this one.
"The Catholic League is not the Church's water boy," says Donohue. "We are here
to defend the Church from the kind of scurrilous attacks that have become all
too frequent in our society. But we will never defend the indefensible."
The Catholic laity are the first, but not the only, victims of the
pedophile-priest scandals. There are many good priests, men who would never harm
a child, who suffer terribly from loss of morale. They feel that others look
upon them with suspicion. They are terrified of leaving themselves open to a
false accusation, which could end their priesthood.
"Father D.," a young priest who serves in the Southwest, tells NRO the abuse
cases have affected relationships within his own family. On a visit home a few
years ago, his sister suggested that her six-year-old son share the bed with
Father D., "because he's a great cuddler." When the sister saw the horrified
expression on her priest brother's face, she understood that her innocent
suggestion could have been a career-killer for Father D. If the children had
told anybody that the boy had shared a bed with a priest, Father D. could have
been thrown out of the priesthood.
"I act around my nieces and nephews the same way I act in the parish: I am never
alone with a child, period, end of story," he says. "False accusations are a
reality, and these horrify me as well. The only thing I can do is what I've
done: Set up barriers and protections, and pray for protection."
Father D. believes much progress has been made towards preventing pedophiles
from entering the priesthood, and in rooting out those closet sex offenders
already in place. However, Father D. says he and other younger clergy are so
outraged by what has been done to faithful members of the laity and good priests
by abusers and those who cover for them that they will no longer play by the old
rules.
"I'll have no qualms whatsoever going straight to the police if I have solid
reasons to believe a fellow priest has abused a child," he says. "I'm at the
point where telling the hierarchy will be just a matter of courtesy, only after
I have informed the proper secular authorities."
Father Joseph Wilson, a parish priest based in Queens, N.Y., who is known for
his fidelity to Catholic teaching, says that given the hierarchy's reaction to
these abuse cases as they've come to light, he can't blame people for concluding
that the Church doesn't take child rape seriously.
"People [in Boston] read that, after a priest had repeatedly preyed on children
in several assignments over many years, with several instances of therapy, his
archdiocese reassigned him yet again because a therapist said that there was a
'low degree of probability' that he would act out again. What on earth do we
expect people to think about that?" Fr. Wilson says.
The veteran priest says if a secular corporation had received the kind of
publicity the Church in Boston did in the Sunday Globe, the Monday papers
would have carried news of the CEO's resignation.
"This is how an institution restores shattered credibility, heals and moves on,"
says Fr. Wilson. "It is futile, and disrespectful towards and victim and the
public, for us to expect healing and restored credibility without personal
accountability."
There is hardly a diocese in this country that hasn't been touched by
clerical-sex scandal. Father Joseph Fessio, the influential Jesuit who heads the
conservative Ignatius Press, blames the American bishops "for not only not
taking action to stop it, but for covering it up."
"The U.S. bishops are destroying their own authority with the faithful by their
unwillingness to address legitimate problems, or by pretending they don't
exist," says Fr. Fessio. "They're appeasing their enemies and abandoning their
friends, because I guess they figure that the loyal Catholics will always remain
Catholic."
RCF's Stephen Brady says the days of conservative Catholics disapproving quietly
in the face of clergy sex scandals must end — for the good of the Church.
"The clergy hasn't stood up to their bishops. The same thing with us laity. If
faithful Catholics want to do something, they need to be more militant," he
says. "The abusive priest, what he does is evil, but he could be mentally ill.
The real evil are those who enable these priests. Cardinal Law is the one who
perpetrated this evil. Without his authority, [Geoghan] could not have
continued."
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Rod Dreher. "Boston Travesty." National Review Online(February,
2002).
This article is reprinted with permission from National Review
Online. To subscribe to the National Review write P.O. Box 668,
Mount Morris, Ill 61054-0668 or phone 815-734-1232.
THE AUTHOR
Rod Dreher is a senior writer with National Review Online.
Copyright © 2002
National Review
Online
| |
|