Search this Site
Home
Contact
Feedback
Mailing List
Topics
100+ Important Documents in United States History

Anti-Catholicism
Apostolic Fathers of the Church
Articles Worth Your Time
Biographies
& Writings of Notable Catholics
Catholic Apologetics
Catholic Calendar
Catholic News Commentary by Michael Voris, S.T.B.
Catholic Perspectives
Catholic Social Teaching
Christology
Church Around the
World

Church Contacts
Church Documents
Church
History
Church Law
Church Teaching
Demonology
Doctors of the Church
Ecumenism
Eschatology
(Death, Heaven, Purgatory, Hell)
Essays on Science
Evangelization
Fathers of the Church
Free Catholic Pamphlets
Heresies
and Falsehoods
How to Vote Catholic
Let There Be Light
Q & A on the Catholic Faith
Links to Churches and Religions
Links to Newspapers, Radio and Television
Links to Recommended Sites
Links to Specialized Agencies
Links to specialized Catholic News
services
Liturgy
Mariology
Marriage & the Family
Modern Martyrs
Mexican Martyrdom
Moral Theology
****
Pope John Paul II's
Theology of the Body
Movie Reviews (USCCB)
New Age
Occult
Parish Bulletin Inserts
Political Issues
Prayer and
Devotions
Pro-Life
****
Hope after Abortion
Project Rachel
****
Help & Information for Men
****
How to Get Pregnant
Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults
Sacraments
Scripture
Spirituality
The
Golden Legend
Vatican
Vocation Links
& Articles

What the Cardinals believe...
World Religions
Pope John
Paul II
In Memoriam
John Paul II
Beatification
Pope
Benedict XVI
In
Celebration

| |
The History of Eucharistic Adoration
Development of Doctrine in the Catholic Church
John A. Hardon,
S.J.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.
I. APOSTOLIC TIMES TO EARLY MIDDLE AGES................
II. BERENGARIUS TO ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI............
III. MIDDLE AGES TO THE COUNCIL OF TRENT....
Before the Council of Trent....
The Council of Trent...........
IV. DEVELOPMENT OF EUCHARISTIC ADORATION............
Forty-Hours Devotion ..........
Perpetual Adoration...........
Visits to the Blessed Sacrament....
Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament....
Eucharistic Congresses........
V. WHY DEVELOPMENT OF EUCHARISTIC DOCTRINE...
Basic Premises of Doctrinal Development .........
Experienced Benefits of Eucharistic Adoration
VI. THE CHURCH'S MAGISTERIUM.............
Pope Pius XII................
Pope John XXIII..............
Pope Paul VI.................
Pope John Paul II............
VII. GRACE THROUGH THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST.....
Introduction
The phenomenal growth of devotion to the Real Presence of Christ in the Holy
Eucharist has puzzled not a few sincere people. Nocturnal Adoration societies,
Perpetual Adoration groups, national associations of the faithful promoting
organized visits to the Blessed Sacrament, Holy Hours before the tabernacle,
monthly, weekly and even daily exposition of the Eucharist in churches and
chapels, in one country after another, have become commonplace.
What to make of all of this? Is this another form of pious eccentricity, or is
it founded on authentic Catholic doctrine and grounded on the solid rock of
Christian revelation?
It is authentic Catholic doctrine and it rests on the unchangeable truth of our
revealed faith. But it needs to be explained, and the explanation is a classic
example of what we call development of doctrine.
By development of doctrine, we mean that some divinely revealed truth has become
more deeply understood and more clearly perceived than it had been before. Under
the guidance of the Holy Spirit, whom Christ promised to send to teach us, the
Church comes to see more deeply what she had always believed, and the resulting
insights find expression in devotion of the faithful that may have been quite
uncommon in the Church's previous history. The whole spectrum of Christology and
Mariology has witnessed such dogmatic progress. Adoration of the Eucharist,
therefore, is simply another, though dramatic, example of doctrinal development.
Always implied in such progress is that, objectively, the revealed truth remains
constant and unchanged. But through the light of the Holy Spirit, the subjective
understanding of the truth becomes more clear, its meaning becomes more certain
and its grasp by the believing mind becomes increasingly more firm.
Our purpose in this short study is to show how the Real Presence of Christ in
the Eucharist has undergone a marvelous development over the centuries. We are
now witnessing what can only be described as the work of the Holy Spirit, Whom
Christ promised, "the Father will send in My name. He will teach you all things,
and bring to your mind whatever I have said to you" (John 14:25).
Chapter I
APOSTOLIC TINES TO THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES
Belief in the real, physical presence of Christ in the Eucharist grew out of the
teaching of the evangelists and St. Paul. They made it plain to the apostolic
Church that the Eucharistic elements were literally Jesus Christ continuing His
saving mission among men.
John and Paul were especially plain. The skepticism of Christ's followers, when
He preached the reality of His Body and Blood as food and drink, made John
record the fact that "many of His disciples withdrew and no longer went about
with Him." Seeing this, Jesus asked the Twelve, "Do you also want to leave me?"
Simon Peter did not understand any more than those who left Christ, but his
loyalty was more firm. "Lord," he answered, "to whom shall we go?" (John
6:66-68).
Paul's letter to the Corinthians rebuked them for making the Agape, which should
have been a beautiful sign of unity, into an occasion of discord. He reminded
them that the Eucharist is no ordinary food. It is actually the Body and Blood
of Christ according to "the tradition which I handed on to you that came to me
from the Lord Himself" (I Corinthians II: 23-26).
At the turn of the first century, Ignatius of Antioch, on his way to martyrdom
in Rome, had to warn the Christians not to be taken in by the Gnostics--a good
modern term would be "visionaries," who denied the Real Presence. Ignatius said
these people abstained from the Eucharist because they did not accept what true
Christians believe, that in the Eucharist is the same Jesus Christ Who lived and
died and rose from the dead for our salvation.
Under the impact of this faith, the early hermits reserved the Eucharist in
their cells. From at least the middle of the third century, it was very general
for the solitaries in the East, especially in Palestine and Egypt, to preserve
the consecrated elements in the caves or hermitages where they lived.
The immediate purpose of this reservation was to enable the hermits to give
themselves Holy Communion. But these hermits were too conscious of what the Real
Presence was not to treat it with great reverence and not to think of it as
serving a sacred purpose by just being nearby.
Not only did they have the Sacrament with them in their cells, but they carried
it on their persons when they moved from one place to another. This practice was
sanctioned by the custom of the <fermentum>, that certainly goes back to as
early as 120 A.D. The rite of <fermentum> was a particle of the Eucharistic
bread (sometimes dipped in the chalice) transported from the bishop of one
diocese to the bishop of another diocese. The latter would then consume the
species at his next solemn Mass as a token of unity between the churches. It was
called a <fermentum> not necessarily because leavened bread was used but because
the Eucharist symbolized the leaven of unity which permeates and transforms
Christians, so that they become one with Christ.
Already in the second century, popes sent the Eucharist to other bishops as a
pledge of unity of faith; and, on occasion, bishops would do the same for their
priests.
As monasticism changed from solitary to community life, the monks received
something of the same privilege of carrying the Eucharist with them. They would
have it on their persons when working in the fields or going on a voyage. The
species was either placed in a small receptacle (<chrismal>) worn
bandoleer-fashion, or in a little bag (<perula>) hung around the neck under
their clothes. Irish and British manuscripts make frequent mention of the
practice. It was not only to have the hosts ready for Communion but also to
insure safety against robbers and protection against the hazards of travel.
The life of St. Comgall (died 601) tells how on one occasion he was attacked by
heathen Pietists while working in a field. On seeing the <chrismal> around his
neck, the attackers did not dare touch him for fear of some retaliation since
they surmised (as the narrator says) that Comgall was carrying his God. The
saint was so moved by the experience that he exclaimed, "Lord, you are my
strength, my refuge, and my Redeemer."
As early as the Council of Nicea (325) we know that the Eucharist began to be
reserved in the churches of monasteries and convents. Again, the immediate
reason for this reservation was for the sick and the dying, and also for the
ceremony of the <fermentum>. But naturally its sacred character was recognized
and the place of reservation was set off from profane usage.
From the beginning of community life, therefore, the Blessed Sacrament became an
integral part of the church structure of a monastery. A bewildering variety of
names was used to identify the place of reservation. <Pastoforium>, <diakonikon>,
<secretarium>, <prothesis> are the most common. As far as we can tell, the
Eucharist was originally kept in a special room, just off the sanctuary but
separated from the church where Mass was offered.
Certainly by the 800's, the Blessed Sacrament was kept within the monastic
church itself, close to the altar. In fact, we have a poem from the year 802,
telling of a pyx containing the Sacred Species reserved on the high altar of the
abbey church at Lindisfarne in England.
The practice of reserving the Eucharist in religious houses was so universal
that there is no evidence to the contrary even before the year 1000. In fact,
numerous regulations are extant which provided for protection of the sacred
elements, as the wording went, "from profanation by mice and impious men." The
species were to be kept under lock and key and sometimes in a receptacle raised
high enough to be out of easy reach of profaning hands.
It is interesting to note that one of the first unmistakable references to
reserving the Blessed Sacrament is found in a life of St. Basil (who died in
379). Basil is said to have divided the Eucharistic Bread into three parts when
he celebrated Mass in the monastery. One part he consumed, the second part he
gave to the monks, and the third he placed in a golden dove suspended over the
altar.
This would suggest that, though we have less access to Oriental sources, the
Eastern monasteries were centuries ahead of the West in reserving the
Eucharistic elements in the monastic church proper and not only in a separate
place.
Among the treasures of Monte Cassino that seem to have been destroyed during the
Second World War were two small ancient tabernacles, one of gold and the other
of silver. They were gifts of Pope Victor III (died 1087), who had been abbot at
Cassino before his election to the papacy.
Chapter II
BERENGARIUS TO ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI
Toward the end of the eleventh century we enter on a new era in the history of
Eucharistic adoration. Until then the Real Presence was taken for granted in
Catholic belief and its reservation was the common practice in Catholic
churches, including the chapels and oratories of religious communities. Suddenly
a revolution hit the Church when Berengarius (999-1088), archdeacon of Angers in
France, publicly denied that Christ was really and physically present under the
species of bread and wine. Others took up the idea and began writing about the
Eucharistic Christ as not exactly the Christ of the Gospels or, by implication,
as not actually there.
The matter became so serious that Pope Gregory VII ordered Berengarius to sign a
retraction. This credo has made theological history. It was the Church's first
definitive statement of what had always been believed and never seriously
challenged. The witness came from the abbot-become-pope, whose faith in the
Blessed Sacrament had been nourished for years in a Benedictine monastery.
Gregory's teaching on the Real Presence was quoted verbatim in Pope Paul VI's
historic document <Mysterium Fidei> (1965) to meet a new challenge to the
Eucharist in our day--very similar to what happened in the eleventh century.
I believe in my heart and openly profess that the bread and wine placed upon the
altar are, by the mystery of the sacred prayer and the words of the Redeemer,
substantially changed into the true and life-giving flesh and blood of Jesus
Christ our Lord, and that after the consecration, there is present the true body
of Christ which was born of the Virgin and offered up for the salvation of the
world, hung on the cross and now sits at the right hand of the Father, and that
there is present the true blood of Christ which flowed from his side. They are
present not only by means of a sign and of the efficacy of the Sacrament, but
also in the very reality and truth of their nature and substance.
With this profession of faith, the churches of Europe began what can only be
described as a Eucharistic Renascence. Processions of the Blessed Sacrament were
instituted; prescribed acts of adoration were legislated; visits to Christ in
the pyx were encouraged; the cells of anchoresses had windows made into the
church to allow the religious to view and adore before the tabernacle. An early
ordinal of the Carmelites included the words "for the devotion of those in the
choir" when referring to the reservation of the species.
From the eleventh century on, devotion to the Blessed Sacrament reserved in the
tabernacle became more and more prevalent in the Catholic world. At every stage
in this development, members of religious orders of men and women took the lead.
The Benedictine Lanfranc, as Archbishop of Canterbury, introduced from France
into England numerous customs affecting the worship of the Real Presence.
St. Francis of Assisi, who was never ordained a priest, had a great personal
devotion to Christ in the Blessed Sacrament. His first admonition on the Holy
Eucharist could not have been more precise.
Sacred Scripture tells us that the Father dwells in "light inaccessible" (I
Timothy 6:16) and that "God is spirit" (John 4:24) and St. John adds, "No one at
any time has seen God" (John 1:18). Because God is a spirit He can be seen only
in spirit; "It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh profits nothing" (John
6:63). But God the Son is equal to the Father and so He too can be seen only in
the same way as the Father and the Holy Spirit. That is why all those were
condemned who saw our Lord Jesus Christ in His humanity but did not see or
believe in spirit in His divinity, that He was the true Son of God. In the same
way now, all those are damned who see the Sacrament of the Body of Christ which
is consecrated on the altar in the form of bread and wine by the words of our
Lord in the hands of the priest, and do not see or believe in spirit and in God
that this
is really the most holy Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ.
It was this
clear faith in Christ's presence in the Eucharist that sustained Francis during
his severest trials. It was this same faith which inspired a whole new tradition
among religious communities of women. Convents had the Sacrament reserved for
adoration--apart from Mass and Holy Communion.
Feast of Corpus Christi.
There was nothing startling, therefore, when Pope Urban IV, in the thirteenth
century, instituted the feast of Corpus Christi. When establishing the feast,
the Pope stressed the love of Christ who wished to remain physically with us
until the end of time.
In the Eucharist, said the Pope, "Christ is with us in His own substance." For
"when telling the Apostles that He was ascending into heaven, He said, 'Behold I
am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world,' thus comforting
them with the gracious promise that He would remain and be with them even by His
bodily presence" (August 11, 1264).
Urban IV commissioned Thomas Aquinas to compose the Liturgy of the Hours for the
feast of Corpus Christi, to be celebrated annually on the Thursday following
Trinity Sunday.
Three hymns which Aquinas composed for the feast are among the most beautiful in
the Catholic liturgy. They express the unchangeable faith of the Church in the
abiding Presence of her Founder on earth. They also explain why the faithful
adore Christ in the Blessed Sacrament. All three hymns are part of the Divine
Office. They are best known by each of their last two verses, which have become
part of the treasury of Catholic hymnology.
* <O Salutaris Hostia> is an act of adoration of Christ the Saving Victim who
opened wide the gate of heaven to man below.
* <Tantum Ergo Sacramentum> is an act of adoration of the Word-made-flesh, where
faith supplies for what the senses cannot perceive.
* <Panis Angelicus> is an act of adoration of that Wondrous Thing where the
lowly and poor are fed, banqueting on their Incarnate Lord and King.
Aquinas, like the Church, never separated the Eucharist as Sacrifice, Communion
and Presence. But, with the Church, he also realized that without the Real
Presence there would be no real sacrifice nor real communion. Aquinas assumed
that God became man so He might offer Himself on Calvary and continue to offer
Himself in the Mass. He became man that He might give Himself to the disciples
at the Last Supper and continue to give Himself to us in Holy Communion. He
became man to live in flesh and blood in Palestine and continue to live now on
earth as the same Jesus Who died and rose from the dead and is seated at the
right hand of His heavenly Father.
Chapter III
MIDDLE AGES TO THE COUNCIL OF TRENT
Since Pope Urban IV instituted the feast of Corpus Christi, the bishops of Rome
had been vigilant to protect the Church's faith in her Founder's unceasing
presence on earth in the Holy Eucharist. But every time a new difficulty arose,
it became a stimulus to making this faith more clear and meaningful, in a word
there was increased development of Eucharistic doctrine.
Before the Council of Trent.
A variety of situations occasioned papal declarations of the Eucharist.
In the fourteenth century, the Armenians asked Clement VI for financial
assistance to pay the heavy subsidies laid on them by the reigning sultan.
Correspondence with the Armenian bishops made him wonder if they professed the
full Catholic faith. Among other propositions he required them to accept was the
statement that, "After the words of consecration there is present numerically
the same (<idem numero>) Body of Christ as was born of the Virgin and was
immolated on the Cross" (September 29, 1351).
Twenty years later, a theoretical question was raised that had serious practical
implications. Some writers speculated whether Christ still remained in the
Eucharist when the sacred species were desecrated. Pope Gregory XI demanded
<rejection> of the following statements:
If a consecrated Host falls or is thrown into a sewer, the mud, or some other
profane place, even though the species remain, the Body of Christ ceases to be
present and the substance of bread returns.
If a consecrated Host is eaten or consumed by a rodent or some other animal,
even while the species remain, the Body of Christ ceases to be present under the
species and the substance of bread returns (August 8, 1371).
More serious was the problem created by the so-called Calixtines in the
fifteenth century. They claimed that the whole Christ is not received unless the
faithful receive Holy Communion under both forms, including the chalice. This
time, the General Council of Constance decided to "declare, decree and define"
as an article of faith that "the entire Body and Blood of Christ are truly
contained both under the species of bread and under the species of wine." This
definition was confirmed by Pope Martin V (September 1, 1425). The implications
for the exposition and adoration of the Eucharist are obvious.
The Council of Trent.
By the sixteenth century, the whole spectrum of Catholic belief in the Holy
Eucharist was challenged by the Reformers. As a consequence, the Council of
Trent treated this subject exhaustively. Every aspect of the Sacrifice of the
Mass, Holy Communion and the Real Presence was clarified and defined.
For our purpose, the Council's teaching on the Real Presence was historic. It
was the dawn of the most significant development of Eucharistic doctrine since
apostolic times. Even a few sentences from Trent are revealing.
The other sacraments do not have the power of sanctifying until someone makes
use of them, but in the Eucharist the very Author of sanctity is present before
the Sacrament is used. For before the apostles received the Eucharist from the
hands of our Lord, He told them that it was His Body that He was giving them.
The Church of God has always believed that immediately after the consecration
the true Body and Blood of our Lord, together with His soul and divinity, exist
under the species of bread and wine. His Body exists under the species of bread
and His Blood under the species of wine according to the import of the words.
But His Body exists under the species of wine, His Blood under the species of
bread, and His soul under both species in virtue of the natural connection and
concomitance which unite the parts of Christ our Lord, who has risen from the
dead and dies now no more.
Moreover, Christ's divinity is present because of its admirable hypostatic union
with His body and soul. It is, therefore, perfectly true that just as much is
present under either species as is present under both. For Christ, whole and
entire, exists under the species of bread and under any part of that species,
and similarly the whole Christ exists under the species of wine and under its
parts.
Given this fact of faith, Trent could logically go on to declare that, "The
only-begotten Son of God is to be adored in the Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist
with the worship of <latria>, including external worship. The Sacrament,
therefore, is to be honored with extraordinary festive celebrations (and)
solemnly carried from place to place in processions according to the
praiseworthy universal rite and custom of the holy Church. The Sacrament is to
be publicly exposed for the people's adoration." Approved by Pope Julius III
(October 11, 1551), these conciliar statements became the foundation for
dogmatic and devotional progress ever since.
Chapter IV
DEVELOPMENT OF EUCHARISTIC ADORATION
As we have seen, there had been reservation and adoration of the Blessed
Sacrament since the early days of the Church. But with the Council of Trent
began a new era in the devotion of the faithful to Christ's Real Presence in the
Eucharist.
The Forty-Hours Devotion.
Before the end of the sixteenth century, Pope Clement VIII in 1592 issued a
historic document on what was called in Italian <Quarant' Ore> (Forty Hours).
The devotion consisted of forty hours of continual prayer before the
Blessed Sacrament exposed. Introduced earlier on a local scale in
Milan, the Bishop of Rome not only authorized the devotion for Rome,
but explained how it should be practiced.
We have determined to establish publicly in this Mother City of Rome an
uninterrupted course of prayer in such wise that in the different churches [he
specifies them] on appointed days, there be observed the pious and salutary
devotion of the Forty Hours; with such an arrangement of churches and times
that, at every hour of the day and night, the incense of prayer shall ascend
without intermission before the face of the Lord.
About a century later (1731) his successor, Clement XIII, published a detailed
set of instructions for the proper carrying out of the Forty-Hours' devotion,
for example:
* The Blessed Sacrament is always exposed on the high altar, except in
patriarchal basilicas.
* Statues, relics and pictures around the altar of exposition are to be removed
or veiled.
* Only clerics in surplices may take care of the altar of exposition.
* There must be continuous relays of worshippers before the Blessed Sacrament
and should include a priest or cleric in major orders.
* No Masses are to be said at the altar of exposition.
Gradually the Forty Hours devotion spread throughout the Catholic world.
Proposed by the Code of Canon Law in 1917, the new Code states that in churches
or oratories where the Eucharist is reserved, "it is recommended (<commendatur>)
. . . that there be held each year a solemn exposition of the Blessed Sacrament
for an appropriate, even if not for a continuous, time so that the local
community may more attentively meditate on and adore the Eucharistic Mystery"
(Canon 942).
Perpetual Adoration.
The term "perpetual adoration" is broadly used to designate the practically
uninterrupted adoration of the Blessed Sacrament. The term may mean several
things:
* The adoration is literally perpetual, so that someone is always in prayer
before the Holy Eucharist.
* The adoration is morally perpetual, with only such short interruptions as
imperative reasons or uncontrollable circumstances require.
* The adoration is uninterrupted for a longer or shorter period, a day or
several days, as in the Forty-Hours devotion.
* The adoration is uninterrupted in one special church or chapel.
* The adoration
is uninterrupted in different churches or chapels in a locality like a diocese
or a country, or throughout the world.
Some writers trace the first beginnings of perpetual adoration to the late
fourth century, when converts to the faith in some dioceses were to adore the
Blessed Sacrament exposed for eight days after their baptism. It is certain,
however, that even before the institution of the feast of Corpus Christi, not
only religious in convents and monasteries but the laity practiced Eucharistic
adoration.
After his victory over the Albigenses, King Louis VII of France asked the Bishop
of Avignon to have the Blessed Sacrament exposed in the Chapel of the Holy Cross
(September 14, 1226). The throng of adorers was so great that the bishop decided
to have the adoration continue day and night. This was later ratified by the
Holy See and continued uninterrupted until 1792 during the
French Revolution. It was resumed in 1829.
It was not until after the Council of Trent, however, that perpetual adoration
began to develop on a world-wide scale. We may distinguish especially the
following forms.
<Cloistered Religious Institutes> were founded for the express purpose of
adoring the Holy Eucharist day and night. Some, like the Benedictines of the
Perpetual Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament in Austria (1654), took a solemn
vow of perpetual adoration.
<Apostolic Religious Institutes> were started to both practice adoration
themselves and promote perpetual worship of the Eucharist among the faithful.
Thus began the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary, and of the
Perpetual Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar. Formally approved in
1817, its aim is to honor and imitate the four states of Christ's life to be
honored and imitated by the exercise of adoration of the Eucharist.
<Men's Nocturnal Adoration> societies began on an international scale in Rome in
1810 with the founding of the Pious Union of the Adorers of the Most Blessed
Sacrament. They spread throughout Europe and into North and South America. Their
focus was (and is) on perpetual adoration in the strict sense.
<Perpetual Eucharistic Associations> of the faithful go back to the seventeenth
century. One of the earliest was started by Baron de Renty in 1641 at St. Paul's
parish in Paris. It was a perpetual adoration society for ladies. At Boulonge in
France (1753), the parishes were divided into twelve groups representing the
twelve months of the year. Each group contained as many parishes as there were
days in the month it represented. Each church in every group was assigned one
day for Eucharistic adoration.
Among the apostles of perpetual adoration for the laity, none has had a more
lasting influence in the modern world than St. Peter Julian Eymard. In 1856 he
founded the Blessed Sacrament Fathers in Paris and two years later, with
Marguerite Guillot, he established the Servants of the Blessed Sacrament, a
cloistered contemplative congregation of women. Peter Eymard's published
conferences on the Real Presence have inspired numerous lay associations. They
have taken his words literally when he said, "In the presence of Jesus Christ in
the Most Blessed Sacrament, all greatness disappears, all holiness humbles
itself and comes to nothing. Jesus Christ is there!"
Visits to the Blessed Sacrament.
Not unlike perpetual adoration, so the history of visits to the Blessed
Sacrament is best known from the monastic spirituality of the early Middle Ages.
In the thirteenth century <Ancren Riwle>, or Rule for Anchoresses, the nuns were
to begin their day by a visit to the Blessed Sacrament.
Priests also, who had easy access to the reserved Holy Eucharist, would
regularly visit Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament. Thus the martyr, St. Thomas a
Becket (1118-1170), in one of his letters writes to a friend, "If you do not
harken to me who have been wont to pray for you in an abundance of tears and
with groanings not a few before the Majesty of the Body of Christ" (<Materials>,
V, 276).
By the fourteenth century, we read how the English mystic, Richard Rolle,
strongly exhorts Christians to visit the nearby church as often as they can.
Why? Because "In the Church is most devotion to pray, for there is God upon the
altar to hear those who pray to Him and to grant them what they ask and what is
best for them" (<Works>, I, 145). Church historians tell us that by the end of
the century, the practice of people visiting the Blessed Sacrament became fairly
common.
One of the sobering facts of the Reformation is to know what happened when the
English Reformers separated from Rome. At first they did not forbid the clergy
to reserve some of both species after the Lord's Supper ceremony--to be taken to
the sick and the dying. But before long, reservation of the Eucharistic elements
became rare. This was to be expected after the <Thirty-Nine Articles> (1571)
declared that transubstantiation was untrue and that the Eucharist should not be
worshiped or carried about in procession.
Three hundred years later, the Anglicans, who started the Oxford Movement,
restored continuous reservation of the Eucharist and encouraged visits to the
Blessed Sacrament. Credit for this return to Catholic Eucharistic piety belongs
to the Anglican Sisterhood of St. Margaret, founded in 1854. The community
records show that soon after
its foundation the Sisters were making daily visits to the Eucharist in their
oratory and, about the same time, Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament was
introduced.
In the Catholic Church, visits to the Blessed Sacrament have become a standard
part of personal and communal prayer. The first Code of Canon Law urged the
"faithful to visit the Most Blessed Sacrament as often as possible" (Canon
1273). The new Code is more specific.
Unless there is a grave reason to the contrary, a church, in which the Blessed
Eucharist is reserved, is to be open to the faithful for at least some hours
every day, so that they can pray before the Blessed Sacrament (Canon 937).
Members of religious institutes are simply told that each day they are to "adore
the Lord Himself present in the Sacrament" (Canon 663, #2).
Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.
As with other Eucharistic devotions, Benediction, as it is commonly called,
began in the thirteenth century. It was strongly influenced by the establishment
of the feast of Corpus Christi. Two hymns, especially <O Salutaris Hostia> and
<Tantum Ergo>, composed by St. Thomas Aquinas, became part of the Benediction
service.
One aspect of the history of Benediction that is not commonly known is its early
association with devotion to the Blessed Virgin. This was already expressed- in
the <Pange Lingua> for the First Vespers of the Corpus Christi liturgy, saying,
"To us He was given, to us he was born of a pure Virgin." Except for Mary, there
would have been no Incarnation, and except for the Incarnation there would be no
Eucharist.
As related by historians, by the early thirteenth century there were organized
confraternities and guilds in great numbers, whose custom was to sing canticles
in the evening of the day before a statue of Our Lady. The canticles were called
<Laude> (praises) and were often composed in the vernacular or even the local
dialect of the people. In the hands of such people as the Franciscan Giacopone
da Todi (1230-1306), these hymns helped to develop a native Italian literature.
The confraternities were called <Laudesi>.
With the stimulus given by the Feast of Corpus Christi, these Marian canticle
meetings were often accompanied by exposition of the Blessed Sacrament. What
began as a practice to add solemnity to the Marian devotions became, in time, a
distinctive form of Eucharistic piety.
In France these Marian canticle sessions were called <Salut>, in the Low
Countries <Lof>, in Germany and England simply <Salve>. They were gradually
combined with exposition of the Eucharist, especially when the Blessed Sacrament
was carried in procession and/or the sick were blessed with the Holy Eucharist.
When people made out their wills, many included bequests for the continued
support of these evening song-fests honoring Our Lady and would specify that the
Blessed Sacrament should be exposed during the whole time of the <Salut>. The
generations-old practice of blessing the sick with the Holy Eucharist at Lourdes
is merely an extension of this combining of Benediction with devotion to the
Blessed Virgin Mary.
Eucharistic Congresses.
As public demonstrations of faith in the Real Presence, local Eucharistic
congresses go back to the Middle Ages. But the first international congress grew
out of the zeal of Marie-Marthe Tamisier (1834-1910) a French laywoman who from
childhood had an extraordinary devotion to the Blessed Sacrament. She called a
day without Holy Communion her Good Friday. Having several times tried
unsuccessfully to enter a religious community, she spent much of her life
spreading devotion to the Real Presence. Inspired by the conferences of Peter
Julian Eymard and directed by Abbe Chevier of Lyons, she first promoted
pilgrimages to shrines where Eucharistic miracles were reported to have taken
place. Finally the first international Eucharistic Congress was held at Lille in
1881. At the fifth Congress at Toulouse in 1886, over fifteen-hundred bishops
and priests, and thirty-thousand of the laity participated.
By now international congresses have been held on all the continents, including
Africa, Asia and Australia. Pope Paul VI attended the thirty-eighth and
thirty-ninth Eucharistic congresses at Bombay in 1964 and Bogota in 1968. Pope
John Paul was to have attended the centenary congress at Lourdes in 1981, but
was prevented because of the assassination attempt on his life on May 13th of
that year.
National congresses have become widespread. During one of these, at Bogota in
1980, Pope John Paul II synthesized the role which, in God's providence, a
Eucharistic congress is meant to serve.
The Eucharistic Congress is first and foremost a great community act of faith in
the presence and in the action of Jesus in the Eucharist, Who remains with us
sacramentally to travel with us along our ways, so that with His power, we can
cope with our problems, our toil, our suffering.
From this moment let us unite round the consecrated Host, the divine Pilgrim
among pilgrims, eager to draw from Him the inspiration and strength to make ours
the needs and aspirations of our emigrant brothers.
The Eucharistic Congress should demonstrate particularly and highlight the fact
that the People of God here on earth lives by the Eucharist, that it draws from
It its strength for everyday toils and for the struggles in all spheres of its
existence (June 30 and July 9, 1980).
More than a century of experience has verified this judgment of the Pope.
Chapter V
WHY DEVELOPMENT OF EUCHARISTIC DOCTRINE
We now move from considering development of Eucharistic adoration to progress in
Eucharistic doctrine. The two forms of development are related, but they are not
the same.
We may say that, historically, the growth in devotion led to development of
doctrine. But saying this is not yet proving it. And our purpose from here on
will be to show how the blessings experienced by the faithful from their worship
of the Blessed Sacrament led, under the Church's guidance, to a phenomenal
growth in understanding the Real Presence as a marvelous source of grace to
those who believe.
Basic Premises of Doctrinal Development.
The Second Vatican Council will go down in history as the Council of dogmatic
progress. It was exactly four hundred years since the close of the Council of
Trent (1563), when the Second Vatican Council opened (1962).
During these four centuries, one after another of the cardinal mysteries of the
Christian faith had grown immensely. The essential deposit of faith has remained
the same, of course. But the meaning of this faith had developed to a degree
that has scandalized many, been misunderstood by others and, we may say, is
recognized by relatively few.
It is not surprising, therefore, that Vatican II should have laid down the basic
principles for dogmatic development. After declaring that divine revelation,
found in Sacred Scripture and Tradition, has been entrusted for safekeeping by
the Church, the Council goes on to say that there is more to the Church's role
than just preserving revealed truth. Her mission is also to provide for growth
in assimilating this truth. The revealed deposit "that comes from the apostles
makes progress in the Church, with the help of the Holy Spirit."
There is a growth in insight into the realities and words that are passed on.
This comes about in various ways. It comes through the contemplation and study
of believers who ponder these things in their hearts. It comes from the intimate
sense of spiritual realities which they experience. And it comes from the
preaching of those who received, along with their rights of succession in the
episcopate, the sure charism of truth. Thus, as the centuries go by, the Church
is always advancing towards the plenitude of divine truth, until eventually the
words of God are fulfilled in her (<Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation>,
II, 8).
Among the ways that the Church has grown in her understanding of the Sacrament
of the Eucharist, we shall concentrate on only one, namely "experience."
Experienced Benefits of Eucharistic Adoration.
The Council of Trent declared that Christ should be worshiped now in the
Eucharist no less than He had been in first century Palestine. Why? Because in
the Blessed Sacrament "it is the same God Whom the apostles adored in Galilee"
(<Decree on the Holy Eucharist>, chapter 5). The adorableness of the Eucharistic
Christ, therefore, is an article of the Catholic faith.
What has become increasingly clear, however, is that Christ in the Eucharist is
not only adorable but entreatable. He is not only to be adored, like Thomas did,
by addressing Him as, "My Lord and my God."
He is also to be asked for what we need, like the blind man who begged, "Lord,
that I may see," or approached like the woman who said to herself, "If I can
even touch His clothes, I shall be well again." By now countless believers have
begged the Savior in the Eucharist for what they needed, and have come close to
Him in the tabernacle or on the altar. Their resulting experience has profoundly
deepened the Church's realization of how literally Christ spoke when He promised
to be with us until the end of time.
The experience has been mainly spiritual: In giving light to the mind and
strength to the will, in providing graces for oneself and others, in enabling
weak human nature to suffer superhuman trials, in giving ordinary people
supernatural power to accomplish extraordinary deeds.
Sts. John Fisher (1469-1535) and Thomas More (1478-1535) were strengthened in
life and prepared themselves for martyrdom by fervent adoration of the Blessed
Sacrament. In one of More's prayers, published after his death, we read, "O
sweet Saviour Christ, by the divers torments of Thy most bitter Passion, take
from me, good Lord, this lukewarm fashion or rather key-cold meditation, and
this dullness in praying to Thee. And give me Thy grace to long for Thy Holy
Sacraments, and especially to rejoice in the Presence of Thy blessed Body, sweet
Saviour Christ, in the Holy Sacrament of the Altar, and duly to thank Thee for
Thy gracious visitation therewith."
St. Francis Xavier (1506-1552) after preaching and baptizing all day would often
spend the night in prayer before the Blessed Sacrament.
St. Mary Magdalen dei Pazzi (1566-1607) was a Carmelite nun from the
age of seventeen. She recommended to busy people in the world to take time out
each day for praying before the Holy Eucharist. "A friend," she wrote, "will
visit a friend in the morning to wish him a good day, in the evening, a good
night, taking also an opportunity to converse with him during the day. In like
manner, make visits to Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament, if your duties
permit it. It is especially at the foot of the altar that one prays well. In all
your visits to our Savior, frequently offer His precious Blood to the Eternal
Father. You will find these visits very conducive to increase in you divine
love."
St. Margaret Mary (1647-1680), a Visitation nun, found before the Blessed
Sacrament the strength she needed to endure what witnesses at her beatification
process declared were "contempt, contradictions, rebukes, insults, reproaches,
without complaining, and praying for those by whom she was ill-treated."
St. Alphonsus Liguori (1696-1787), patron saint of confessors, wrote a whole
book on visits to the Blessed Sacrament. He advised, "withdraw yourself from
people and spend at least a quarter of an hour, or a half-hour, in some church
in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament. Taste and see how sweet is the Lord,
and you will learn from your own experience how many graces this will bring
you."
St. John Vianney, the Cure of Ars (1786-1859), told his people, "Our Lord is
hidden there in the tabernacle, waiting for us to come and visit Him, and make
our requests to Him...In heaven, where we shall be glorious and triumphant, we
shall see Him in all His glory. If He had presented Himself, before us in that
glory now, we should not have dared to approach Him; but He hides Himself like a
person in prison, who might say to us, 'You do not see Me, but that is no
matter; ask of Me all you wish and I will grant it."' The Cure of Ars spent most
of his long hours in prayer before the Blessed Sacrament. During his homilies,
he would often turn towards the tabernacle, saying with emotion, "He is there!"
So the litany of witnesses to the power of the Real Presence went on. By the
time of the first international Eucharistic Congress in 1881, the evidence was
more than sufficient for the Church's magisterium to speak extensively on the
subject.
Chapter VI
THE CHURCH'S MAGISTERIUM
It was no coincidence that international Eucharistic Congresses came into
existence because of the experience of the faithful. As mentioned before, it was
a laywoman, Marie-Marthe Tamisier, whose personal awareness of the spiritual
energy available from the Real Presence that Providence used to bring about the
first international Eucharistic Congress at Lille, in France, in 1881.
In the papal brief which Leo XIII addressed to those attending that Congress, he
spoke of the "great joy" he had in commending the bishops who organized the
assembly. He approved its purpose, namely "of repairing the iniquities wreaked
upon the Most Holy Sacrament and of promoting Its worship." He praised the
laymen for "the great extension of the work of Nocturnal Adoration" and for the
report of "how this salutary institution is taking root, progressing and bearing
fruit everywhere."
The key factor, according to Pope Leo, is that Eucharistic Adoration is bearing
supernatural fruit wherever the practice is nourished by the faith of the
people.
St. Pius X's devotion to the Real Presence, biographers say, was at the heart of
his historic promotion of early and frequent Holy Communion. On the day of his
canonization, Pope Pius XII identified the source of his predecessor's apostolic
genius: "In the profound vision which he had of the Church as a society, Pope
Pius X recognized that it was the Blessed Sacrament which had the power to
nourish her intimate life substantially, and to elevate her high above all other
human societies" (<Quest' ore di fulgente>, May 29, 1954).
Anticipating the publication of his decree on frequent, even daily, Communion
(December 20, 1905), Pius X requested that the international Eucharistic
Congress that year should be held in Rome. It was the sixteenth in sequence and
the first one in the Eternal City. The Pope opened the Congress with the Mass
which he celebrated and then participated in the procession with the Blessed
Sacrament.
Popes Benedict XV and Pius XI carried on the papal tradition of encouraging
adoration of the Holy Eucharist, and prayers of expiation and petition to Our
Lord in the Blessed Sacrament.
It was Benedict XV who issued the first Code of Canon Law in 1917 which
legislated the reservation of the Blessed Sacrament in "every parish or
quasi-parish church, and in the church connected with the residence of exempt
men and women religious" (Canon 1265, #1). It was this same Code which
encouraged the private and public exposition of the Holy Eucharist.
Pope Pius XI associated the worship of Christ in the Blessed Sacrament with
expiation for sin. St. Margaret Mary had been canonized in 1920, just two years
before Achille Ratti was elected Pope. In 1928, he wrote a lengthy encyclical on
Reparation to the Sacred Heart. Its whole theme is on the desperate need to
plead for God's mercy, especially through the Holy Eucharist. During her prayers
before the Blessed Sacrament, Christ revealed to Margaret Mary "the infinitude
of His love, at the same time, in the manner of a mourner." The Savior said,
"Behold this Heart which has loved men so much and has loaded them with all
benefits, and for this boundless love has had no return but neglect and
contumely, and this often from those who were bound by a debt and duty of a more
special love."
Among the ways to make reparation to the Heart of Christ, the Pope urged the
faithful to "make expiatory supplications and prayers, prolonged for a whole
hour-which is rightly called the 'Holy Hour"' (<Miserentissimus Redemptor>, May
8, 1928). It was understood that the Holy Hour was to be made even as the
original message was received by St. Margaret Mary, before the Holy Eucharist.
Pope Pius XII.
With Pius XI's successor, we begin a new stage in the Church's teaching on the
efficacy of prayer addressed to Christ really present in the Sacrament of the
altar.
A year before his election to the See of Peter, Cardinal Pacelli was sent as
papal legate to the international Eucharistic Congress at Budapest in Hungary.
It was 1938, a year before the outbreak of the Second World War. The theme of
Pacelli's address at the Congress was that Christ had indeed left this earth in
visible form at His Ascension. But He is emphatically still on earth, the Jesus
of history, in the Sacrament of His love.
Pius XII published forty-one encyclicals during his almost twenty year
pontificate. One feature of these documents is their reflection of doctrinal
development that has taken place in the Catholic Church in modern times. Thus,
development in the Church's understanding of herself as the Mystical Body of
Christ (<Mystici Corporis Christi>, 1943); in her understanding of the Bible
(<Diving Afflante Spiritu>, 1943); in her understanding of the Blessed Virgin (<Deiparae
Virginis Mariae>, 1946), proposing the definition of Mary's bodily Assumption
into heaven.
The Encyclical <Mediator Dei> (1947) was on the Sacred Liturgy. As later events
were to show, it became the doctrinal blueprint for the Constitution of the
Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council.
Nine complete sections of <Mediator Dei> deal with "Adoration of the Eucharist."
This provides the most authoritative explanation of what the Pope describes as
"the worship of the Eucharist," which "gradually developed as something distinct
from the Sacrifice of the Mass."
It seems best briefly to quote from these sections and offer some commentary.
1. <Adoration of the Eucharist>. The basis for all Eucharistic devotion is the
fact that Christ in the Blessed Sacrament is the Son of God in human form.
The Eucharistic Food contains, as all are aware, "truly, really and
substantially the Body and Blood together with the Soul and Divinity of Our Lord
Jesus Christ." It is no wonder, then, that the Church, even from the beginning,
adored the Body of Christ under the appearance of bread; this is evident from
the very rites of the august Sacrifice, which prescribe that the sacred
ministers should adore the Most Holy Sacrament by genuflecting or by profoundly
bowing their heads.
The Sacred Councils teach that it is the Church's tradition right from the
beginning, to worship "with the same adoration the Word Incarnate as well as His
own flesh," and St. Augustine asserts that: "No one eats that flesh without
first adoring it," while he adds that "not only do we not commit a sin by
adoring it, but we do sin by not adoring it." (<Mediator Dei>, paragraph
129-130)
Everything else depends on this primary article of faith: that the Eucharist
contains the living Christ, in the fullness of His human nature, and therefore
really present under the sacred species; and in the fullness of His divine
nature, and therefore to be adored as God.
2. <Dogmatic Progress>. There has been a deeper grasp by the Church of every
aspect of the mystery of the Eucharist. But one that merits special attention is
the growing realization, not only of Christ's sacrificial oblation in the Mass,
but of His grace-filled presence outside of Mass.
It is on this doctrinal basis that the worship of adoring the Eucharist was
founded and gradually developed as something distinct from the Sacrifice of the
Mass. The reservation of the Sacred Species for the sick and those in danger
introduced the praiseworthy custom of adoring the Blessed Sacrament which is
reserved in our Churches. This practice of adoration, in fact, is based on
strong and solid reasons. For the Eucharist is at once a Sacrifice and a
Sacrament: but it differs from the other Sacraments in this that it not only
produces grace, but contains, in a permanent manner, the Author of grace
Himself. When, therefore, the Church bids us adore Christ hidden behind the
Eucharistic veils and pray to Him for the spiritual and temporal favors of which
we ever stand in need, she manifests living faith in her divine Spouse who is
present beneath these veils, she professes her gratitude to Him and she enjoys
the intimacy of His friendship (131).
The key to seeing why there should be a Eucharistic worship distinct from the
Mass is that the Eucharist is Jesus Christ. No less than His contemporaries in
Palestine adored and implored Him for the favors they needed, so we should
praise <and> thank Him, and implore Him for what we need.
3. Devotional Development. As a consequence of this valid progress in doctrine,
the Church has developed a variety of Eucharistic devotions.
Now, the Church in the course of centuries has introduced various forms of this
worship which are ever increasing in beauty and helpfulness; as, for example,
visits of devotion to the tabernacle, even every day, Benediction of the Blessed
Sacrament; solemn processions, especially at the time of Eucharistic Congresses,
which pass through cities and villages; and adoration of the Blessed Sacrament
publicly exposed. Sometimes these public acts of adoration are of short
duration. Sometimes they last for one, several and even for forty hours. In
certain places they continue in turn in different churches throughout the year,
while elsewhere adoration is perpetual, day and night (132).
To be stressed is that these are not merely passing devotional practices. They
are founded on divinely revealed truth. And, as the Pope is at pains to point
out, "these exercises of piety have brought a wonderful increase in faith and
supernatural life to the Church militant upon earth."
Are these practices liturgical? "They spring from the inspiration of the
Liturgy," answers Pius XII. "And if they are performed with due decorum and with
faith and piety, as the liturgical rules of the Church require, they are
undoubtedly of the very greatest assistance in living the life of the Liturgy."
Does this not confuse the "Historic Christ" with the Eucharistic Christ? Not at
all, says the Pope.
On the contrary, it can be claimed that by this devotion the faithful bear
witness to and solemnly avow the faith of the Church that the Word of God is
identical with the Son of the Virgin Mary, Who suffered on the Cross, Who is
present in a hidden manner in the Eucharist and Who reigns upon His heavenly
throne. Thus St. John Chrysostom states: "When you see It (the Body of Christ)
exposed, say to yourself: thanks to this Body, I am no longer dust and ashes, I
am no more a captive but a freeman: hence I hope to obtain Heaven and the good
things that are there in store for me, eternal life, the heritage of the Angels,
companionship with Christ" (134).
Among other forms of Eucharistic devotion recommended by Pope Pius
XII, he gave special attention to Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament. He spoke
of the "great benefit in that custom which makes the priest raise aloft the
Bread of Angels before congregations with heads bowed down in adoration and
forming with It the sign of the cross." This "implores the Heavenly Father to
deign to look upon His Son who for love of us was nailed to the Cross and for
His sake and through Him willed . . . to shower down heavenly favors upon those
whom the Immaculate Blood of the Lamb has redeemed" (135).
Pope John XXIII.
Unlike his predecessor, John XXIII did not publish any extensive documentation
on the Eucharistic Liturgy. But he took every occasion to urge the faithful,
especially priests, to pray before the Blessed Sacrament.
In the life of a priest nothing could replace the silent and prolonged prayer
before the altar. The adoration of Jesus, our God; thanksgiving, reparation for
our sins and for those of all men, the prayer for so many intentions entrusted
to Him, combine to raise that priest to a greater love for the Divine Master to
whom he has promised faithfulness and for men who depend on his priestly
ministry.
With the practice of this enlightened and fervent worship of the Eucharist, the
spiritual life of the priest increases and there are prepared the missionary
energies of the most valuable apostles.
All the while that he was urging priests to pray before the altar, the Pope
reminded them that "the Eucharistic Prayer in the full sense is the Holy
Sacrifice of the Mass" (Encyclical <Sacerdotii Nostri Primordia>, August 11,
1959). After all, without the Mass there would be no Real Presence. We might say
that Christ's abiding presence in the Holy Eucharist is an extension of the
Eucharistic sacrifice.
On the eve of the Second Vatican Council, Pope John participated in the Corpus
Christi procession of the Blessed Sacrament in Rome. On that occasion, he
composed an earnest prayer for Christ's blessings on the forthcoming Council.
O Jesus, look upon us from your Sacrament like a good Shepherd, by which name
the Angelic Doctor invokes you, and with him Holy Church. O Jesus, good
Shepherd, this is your flock, the flock that you have gathered from the ends of
the earth, the flock that listens to your word of life, and intends to guard it,
practice it and preach it. This is the flock that follows you meekly, O Jesus,
and wishes so ardently to see, in the Ecumenical Council, the reflection of your
loving face in the features of your Church, the mother of all, the mother who
opens her arms and heart to all, and here awaits, trembling and trustful, the
arrival of all her Bishops (June 21, 1962).
Words could not be plainer. They could also not be more authoritative. The Vicar
of Christ was teaching, by example, how effective prayer to our Lord in the
Eucharist can be not only for ourselves personally, but for the whole Church of
God.
Pope Paul VI.
Although Pope John XXIII opened the Second Vatican Council and
lived through its first session in 1962, he did not promulgate any of its
sixteen documents. That was done by his successor, Pope Paul VI.
The first conciliar document issued by Paul VI was the <Constitution on the
Sacred Liturgy> (December 4, 1963). Less than two years later, just before the
last session of the Council, he published the encyclical <Mysterium Fidei>
(September 3, 1965). It is a remarkable document in several ways.
* It was issued during the Second Vatican Council.
* It opens with a glowing tribute to the Council's Constitution on the Liturgy.
* It praises those who "seek to investigate more profoundly and to understand
more fruitfully the doctrine on the Holy Eucharist."
* But then it goes on to give "reasons for serious pastoral concern and
anxiety." Specifically, Paul VI says that opinions are being spread which
reinterpret "doctrine already defined by the Church," and in particular "the
dogma of transubstantiation" (I).
Most of the encyclical, therefore, is a doctrinal analysis of the Real Presence.
By all accounts, it is the most extensive and penetrating declaration in papal
history on two articles of the Catholic faith: the corporeal presence of Jesus
Christ in the Blessed Sacrament and His communication of grace through this
Eucharistic presence now on earth.
1. The Real Presence. If we are to understand the sacramental presence of Christ
in the Eucharist, "which constitutes the greatest miracle of its kind, we must
listen with docility to the voice of the teaching and praying Church." What does
the doctrine and devotion of the Church tell us? This voice, which constantly
echoes the voice of Christ, assures us that the way Christ is made present in
this Sacrament is none other than by the change of the whole substance of the
bread into His Body, and of the whole substance of the wine into His Blood, and
that this unique and truly wonderful change the Catholic Church rightly calls
transubstantiation. As a result of transubstantiation, the species of bread and
wine undoubtedly take on a new meaning and a new finality, for they no longer
remain ordinary bread and ordinary wine, but become the sign of something
sacred, the sign of a spiritual food. However, the reason they take on this new
significance and this new finality is simply because they contain a new reality
which we may justly term ontological. There is no longer under the species what
had been there before. It is something entirely different. Why? Not only because
of the faith of the church, but in objective reality. After the change of the
substance or nature of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ,
nothing remains of the bread and wine but the appearances, under which Christ,
whole and entire, in His physical reality is bodily present (V).
Of course this presence is beyond our comprehension. Of course it is different
from the way bodies are naturally present and therefore can be sensibly
perceived. Subjectively, we cannot see or touch the Body of Christ in the
Eucharist. But objectively (in reality) and ontologically (in His being) He is
there.
2. Communication of Grace. Once the Real Presence is properly recognized, it is
only logical to conclude that we should worship the Savior in the Blessed
Sacrament. It is equally logical to expect Him to confer blessings on a sinful
world by His presence among us. Three passages in <Mysterium Fidei> make this
conclusion perfectly clear.
In the first statement, Pope Paul recalls the teaching of St. Cyril of
Alexandria (died 444) who had been so active in defending the physical union of
Christ's humanity in the Incarnation as well as in the Eucharist. The reason is
that the Eucharist is the Incarnate Son of God who became, and remains, the Son
of Mary.
St. Cyril of Alexandria rejects as folly the opinion of those who maintained
that if a part of the Eucharist was left over for the following day, it did not
confer sanctification. "For" he says, "neither Christ is altered nor His Holy
Body changed, but the force and power and revivifying grace remain with it"
(VI).
Once the elements of bread and wine have been consecrated and transubstantiation
has taken place, the living Christ remains as long as the Eucharistic species
remain. Then, because Christ is present, His humanity remains a source of
life-giving grace.
In his second statement on the Eucharist as a channel of grace, Pope Paul
carefully distinguishes between the Eucharist as Sacrifice and Communion, and
the Eucharist as Presence.
Not only while the Sacrifice is offered and the Sacrament is received, but as
long as the Eucharist is kept in our churches and oratories, Christ is truly the
Emmanuel, that is "God with us." Day and night He is in our midst, He dwells
with us, full of grace and truth. He restores morality, nourishes virtues,
consoles the afflicted and strengthens the weak (VI).
These verbs--restores, nourishes, consoles and strengthens--are all forms of
divine grace which Christ confers by His presence in the Eucharist.
In his third statement on the efficacy of the Real Presence, Paul VI adds the
final touch to his teaching. No doubt the living Savior in the Blessed Sacrament
is there "full of grace and truth." But there must be a responsive faith on our
part.
Anyone who approaches this august Sacrament with special devotion, and endeavors
to return generous love for Christ's own infinite love, will experience and
fully understand--not without spiritual joy and fruit--how precious is the life
hidden with Christ in God, and how great is the value of converse with Christ.
For there is nothing more consoling on earth, nothing more efficacious for
advancing along the road of holiness (VI).
The important word in that last sentence is "efficacious." Provided we approach
the Real Presence with believing love, Christ will perform wonders of His grace
in our lives.
Pope John Paul II.
Building on the teaching of his predecessors, John Paul II has come to be known
as the Pope of the Real Presence. In one document and address after another, he
has repeated what needs repetition for the sake of emphasis: "The Eucharist, in
the Mass and outside of the Mass, is the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, and is
therefore deserving of the worship that is given to the living God, and to Him
alone" (Opening address in Ireland, Phoenix Park, September 29, 1979).
But the Pope has done more than merely repeat what had been said
before. He placed the capstone on the Eucharistic teaching of the
magisterium that we have been examining. He did so by explaining in
the most unambiguous language that there is only one Sacrament of the
Eucharist. Yet this one Sacrament confers grace in three different
ways. Each manner of giving grace corresponds to the three forms in
which the Eucharist has been instituted by Christ.
It is at one and the same time a Sacrifice-Sacrament, a Communion-Sacrament, and
a Presence-Sacrament (Encyclical <Redemptor Hominis>, March 4, 1979, IV, 20).
The revealed foundation for this conclusion is the fact of Christ's abiding
presence in the Eucharist. It is the "Redeemer of Man" who by His Passion and
death on the Cross merited the grace of our salvation. But it is mainly through
the Eucharist that the same Jesus Christ now channels this grace to a sinful
human race.
It is in this comprehensive sense that we can say, "the Church lives by the
Eucharist, by the fullness of this Sacrament." This fullness, however, spans all
three levels of its sacramental existence, where, by "sacrament" the Church
means a sensible sign, instituted by Christ, through which invisible grace and
inward sanctification are communicated to the soul.
The Mass is the Sacrifice-Sacrament of the Eucharist. As the Council of Trent
declared, the Sacrifice of the Mass is not only an offering of praise and
thanksgiving. It is also a source of grace: "By this oblation, the Lord is
appeased, He grants grace and the gift of repentance, and He pardons wrongdoings
and sins," the blessings of Redemption which Christ won for us by His bloody
death on Calvary are now "received in abundance through this unbloody oblation"
(September 17, 1562).
Holy Communion
is the Communion-Sacrament of the Eucharist. As the same Council of Trent
defined, Christ present in the Eucharist is not only spiritually eaten, but also
really and sacramentally. We actually receive His Body and Blood, and we are
truly nourished by His grace. It was Christ's will "That this Sacrament be
received as the soul's spiritual food, to sustain and build up those who live
with His life." It is also to be "a remedy to free us from our daily defects and
to keep us from mortal sin" (October 11, 1551).
The Real Presence is the Presence-Sacrament of the Eucharist. How? The Real
Presence is a Sacrament in every way that the humanity of Christ is a channel of
grace to those who believe that the Son of God became man for our salvation.
Chapter VII
GRACE THROUGH THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST
The underlying theme of the Church's Eucharistic teaching is the fact of
"Christ's consoling presence in the Blessed Sacrament. His Real Presence in the
fullest sense; the substantial presence by which the whole and complete Christ,
God and man, is present" (Pope John Paul II, September 29, 1979).
Once this fact of faith is recognized, it is not difficult to see why prayer
before the Blessed Sacrament is so efficacious. Indeed it explains why, without
a second thought, Catholics have simply referred to the Real Presence as the
Blessed <Sacrament>. It is a Sacrament, or better, it is the one Sacrament which
not only confers grace but contains the very source of grace, namely Jesus
Christ.
As we read the Gospels, we are struck by the marvelous power that Christ's
humanity had in effecting changes in the persons who came into contact with Him.
Already in the womb of His mother, He sanctified the unborn John the Baptist the
moment Elizabeth heard the voice of Mary. At Cana in Galilee, at His Mother's
request, Jesus told the servants, "Fill the jars with water." When the steward
tasted the water, it had turned into wine.
Jesus spoke with human lips when He preached the Sermon on the Mount, when He
taught the parables, when he forgave sinners, when he rebuked the Pharisees,
when He foretold His Passion and told His followers to carry the cross. Jesus
touched the blind with human hands, and healed the lepers by speaking with a
human voice. On one occasion a sick woman touched the hem of His garment.
"Immediately," relates St. Mark, "aware that power had gone out from Him, Jesus
turned round in the crowd and said, 'who touched My clothes?"' The woman was
instantly healed. Significantly, Jesus told her, "your faith has restored you to
health."
All through His public ministry, the humanity of Christ was the means by which
He enlightened the minds of his listeners, restored their souls to divine
friendship, cured their bodies of disability and disease, and assured them of
God's lasting peace. That is what St. John meant when, in the prologue of his
Gospel, he said, "though the Law was given through Moses, grace and truth come
through Jesus Christ." Why? Because Christ is the only-begotten Son of God who
became flesh, and not only lived but, in the Eucharist, continues to live among
us .
In order to draw on these resources of infinite wisdom and power, available in
the Eucharist, we must believe. In the words of the <Adoro Te>, we can say: "I
believe everything that the Son of God has said, and nothing can be truer than
this word of the Truth. Only the Godhead was hidden on the cross, but here the
humanity is hidden as well. Yet I believe and acknowledge them both."
Those who can thus speak to Christ in the Eucharist will learn from experience
what the Church means when she tells us that the Real Presence is a Sacrament.
It is the same Savior Who assumed our human nature to die for us on Calvary and
who now dispenses through that same humanity, now glorified, the blessings of
salvation.
*******************************
<This study of the History of Eucharistic Adoration was done by a professional
theologian. It is part of a planned series on the doctrinal foundations of the
Sacrifice, Communion and Presence-Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist.
In an age of widespread confusion and disbelief, this document offers
unprecedented clarity in the most important element of our faith. I recommend
that it be prayerfully studied and widely circulated. It is thoroughly
researched and well-documented, and promises to enlighten, instruct and inspire
countless souls to an undying love of our Eucharistic Lord.>
Bishop Jerome J. Hastrich Gallup, New Mexico U.S.A.
| |
|